ZIP code
55150
in Mendota, MinnesotaPopulation 201
70.11/ 100
Ranked #572 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.8%)
Ranked #7 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 0.9%)
Ranked #7 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (top 3.2%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Housing insecurity
4.4%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
4.8%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
23.8%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
3.0%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
3.6%
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
25.9%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
8.4%
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Mammography
83.8%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Park land
36.7%
in the top 3.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
10.6%
in the bottom 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Mendota, Minnesota (ZIP 55150) lands in the top 1.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (572nd) and the top 0.9% of Minnesota (7th).
The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and food insecurity lands in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and utility shutoff is in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Modeled transportation settles in the bottom 0.6% nationally, loneliness resides in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and cognitive disability registers in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Modeled mammography rests in the top 1.5% nationally, park land stands in the top 3.7% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health lies in the bottom 1.4% nationally.
Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 55123, about 3.4 miles away, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 90%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 98%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 97%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 98%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 91%
8%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 68%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 15%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 36%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 84%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 97%
16%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.5%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 99%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.7%
8%
Disability
healthier than 98%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 88%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 22%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 8%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 92%
16%
Preventive Care
in the top 1.0%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 96%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.5%
8%
Disability
healthier than 94%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 76%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 59%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 43%
14%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 11%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
55116
Minnesotashares a border
Score 62.35
Closest healthier
55123
Minnesotaabout 3.4 mi away
Score 70.24
Similar health profile
03840
New Hampshire100% similar profile
Score 65.15
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 22.9% | 20.5–25.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 29.4% | 26.7–32.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.3% | 9.2–11.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.1% | 8.1–10.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.2% | 4.5–6.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 3.7% | 2.9–4.6 |
| Depression among adults | 21.7% | 19.3–24.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 8.7% | 7.4–10.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 36.0% | 33.1–38.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 30.5% | 26.9–34.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.5% | 2.1–2.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 4.5% | 3.6–5.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.2% | 3.2–5.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.0% | 77.4–82.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 77.6% | 75.2–80.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 90.2% | 88.4–91.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 75.6% | 72.6–78.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 78.1% | 76.0–80.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 83.8% | 79.8–87.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.6% | 15.5–20.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 7.5% | 5.5–9.7 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 17.1% | 14.1–20.6 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 23.8% | 21.2–26.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 10.6% | 8.7–12.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 11.5% | 9.9–13.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 9.0% | 7.7–10.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 8.4% | 7.0–10.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 21.9% | 18.9–25.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.3% | 5.4–7.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 4.6% | 3.7–5.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 8.7% | 7.1–10.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.0% | 1.7–2.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.5% | 2.1–3.0 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 16.3% | 13.8–18.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 4.8% | 3.4–6.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 2.9% | 1.9–4.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 4.4% | 3.3–5.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 3.6% | 2.9–4.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 25.9% | 22.8–29.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 3.0% | 2.3–3.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 12.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 7.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 4.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 39.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 4.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872 |
| Households without a vehicle | 2.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871 |
| Broadband subscription | 94.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 30.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 22.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871 |
| Homeownership rate | 76.7% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.4% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871 |
| Foreign-born population | 5.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873 |
| Single-parent households | 30.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 56.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870 |
| Population 65+ | 10.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873 |
| Median age | 39.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873 |
| Median household income | $111,250 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864 |
| Median home value | $310,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857 |
| Median gross rent | $875 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $925 ($650–$1,588) n=759 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 86.5 yr ± 1.62 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.62 years of 86.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured