Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47906

in West Lafayette, IndianaPopulation 75,198

51.48/ 100

Ranked #14,151 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #200 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #9 of 29 Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

24.7%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

3.9%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.9%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.9%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.5%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.3%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.1%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.5%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 47906, one of several in West Lafayette, Indiana lands in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,151st) and the top 26% of Indiana (200th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled high blood pressure lands in the bottom 2.6% nationally, stroke lies in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol rests in the bottom 4.0% nationally, diabetes registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and obesity resides in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability settles in the bottom 4.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled expected annual loss is in the top 1.8% nationally, and slow internet speeds sits in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lands in the top 4.7% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. On the overall standing, ZIP 47905, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.9%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 7.0 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 96.3 (top 10%) — 89 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,833 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults16.0%14.2–17.8
High blood pressure among adults24.7%21.9–27.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Depression among adults26.0%22.8–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.5%27.4–33.6
Obesity among adults26.1%21.7–30.8
Stroke among adults1.9%1.8–2.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.6%9.6–14.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.9–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure61.4%58.9–63.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.4%71.9–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults73.3%70.8–75.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.1%64.6–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.8%52.4–59.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%71.2–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.1–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.8–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.6%18.4–25.0
Short sleep duration among adults37.4%32.4–42.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%17.0–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults21.4%19.2–23.7
Frequent physical distress among adults11.3%10.1–12.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.0%18.0–22.1
Any disability among adults30.7%27.2–34.3
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Independent living disability among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Mobility disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.0
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.1%21.0–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.9%18.4–23.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.5–15.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.4–14.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.7–14.6
Loneliness among adults37.3%33.0–41.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–644.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)63.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle12.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription90.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate43.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population17.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households47.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+9.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age22.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$53,103$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$323,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,217$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured