Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55103

in St. Paul, MinnesotaPopulation 13,125

39.67/ 100

Ranked #26,973 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #853 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 1.6%)

Ranked #223 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 0.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

42.2%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

19.1%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

27.3%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

35.9%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

572 units

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.4%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

5.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.3 mi

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 55103, one of several in St. Paul, Minnesota lands in the bottom 16% nationally (26,973rd) and the bottom 1.6% of Minnesota (853rd).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum, and subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 3.8% nationally. Transit rests in the top 4.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled loneliness stands in the top 1.8% nationally, modeled transportation lies in the top 2.7% nationally, and households without a vehicle lands in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled food insecurity sits in the top 3.2% nationally, vision disability is in the top 6.3% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 6.3% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 4.8% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 55101, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 98%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.7%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 97%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.5%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.1 ± 1.9 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.7 years — 3.6 years below them.

    Ranked #2,828 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.2%19.4–23.0
High blood pressure among adults35.7%33.4–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.2–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.4–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Depression among adults26.0%23.6–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.2%14.7–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.9%31.5–36.4
Obesity among adults38.8%35.6–42.1
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.8%18.9–24.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.4%12.6–16.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.8%71.4–76.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.3%70.8–75.9
Cholesterol screening among adults77.8%75.8–79.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.4%56.1–62.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.9%47.4–52.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%67.7–77.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.0%11.5–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.7%19.5–24.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.9%30.0–36.0
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%32.9–38.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.0%28.5–33.6
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%18.2–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.7–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.7%17.9–21.7
Any disability among adults37.8%35.0–40.8
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.2–7.5
Independent living disability among adults13.1%11.9–14.4
Mobility disability among adults18.5%16.8–20.3
Self-care disability among adults6.9%6.4–7.5
Vision disability among adults9.4%8.7–10.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.5%29.7–35.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.9%33.1–38.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults31.1%28.5–33.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.6%21.3–25.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.1%17.3–20.9
Loneliness among adults42.2%39.2–45.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.5%14.8–18.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–649.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)18.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle27.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate41.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population23.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households31.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+10.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age33.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$48,390$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$257,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,054$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured