Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55411

in Minneapolis, MinnesotaPopulation 27,741

40.96/ 100

Ranked #26,058 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #848 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 2.1%)

Ranked #221 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 1.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,411 units

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

19.5%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

27.2%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.7%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

35.4%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

180 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

18.2%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

22%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 55411, one of several in Minneapolis, Minnesota comes out in the bottom 19% nationally (26,058th) and the bottom 2.1% of Minnesota (848th).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled transportation resides in the top 2.5% nationally, housing insecurity rests in the top 2.8% nationally, and loneliness lies in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled food insecurity sits in the top 3.4% nationally, modeled utility shutoff settles in the top 3.6% nationally, and households without a vehicle registers in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled tree cover stands at the national minimum. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 0.7% nationally, and walkability is in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 3.4% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 55401, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 1.0%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 1.0%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.6 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $60,225 predicts 78.1 years — 4.5 years below.

    Ranked #5,334 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.6 ± 1.2 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.0 years — 6.5 years below them.

    Ranked #3,600 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 6.6 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 71.1 — 65 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,860 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults18.2%16.8–19.6
High blood pressure among adults34.6%32.6–36.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.8–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.5
Depression among adults26.3%24.3–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.5–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.0%28.1–32.0
Obesity among adults37.4%34.5–40.3
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.4%19.6–25.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.9%14.2–17.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.7%67.4–72.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.3%71.1–75.5
Cholesterol screening among adults78.2%76.4–80.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.9%54.3–59.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.1%43.8–48.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.7%69.7–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%13.3–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.8%18.9–22.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.7%30.2–35.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%35.8–40.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.7%25.6–29.9
Frequent mental distress among adults20.3%18.7–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.7–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.9%19.1–22.7
Any disability among adults36.5%34.1–39.1
Hearing disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Independent living disability among adults12.5%11.4–13.7
Mobility disability among adults15.9%14.5–17.4
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.8–6.9
Vision disability among adults8.7%8.0–9.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.5%29.2–33.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.4%32.8–38.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults31.5%28.9–34.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.2%24.9–29.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.5%17.8–21.2
Loneliness among adults40.7%38.3–43.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.2%16.5–20.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–6412.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)16.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle22.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription87.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)44.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate52.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population17.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households25.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+9.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age31.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$60,225$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$245,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,226$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.6 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 73.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured