Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55071

in St. Paul Park, MinnesotaPopulation 5,719

56.31/ 100

Ranked #7,955 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #254 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #156 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.1%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.8%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

27.2%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.4%

in the top 13.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

St. Paul Park, Minnesota (ZIP 55071), by its overall standing, sits in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,955th) and the top 29% of Minnesota (254th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 3.3% nationally, high blood pressure is in the bottom 7.7% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Fatal road crashes rests in the bottom 12.7% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 12.1% nationally. By contrast, modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 1.1% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water settles at the national maximum. Modeled fine-particle registers in the top 10.5% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands in the top 11.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 13.0% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 55016, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 2.1 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 86.3 — 84 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,505 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.8%18.6–23.1
High blood pressure among adults28.8%25.9–31.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.3–6.2
Depression among adults25.0%22.0–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.1–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.0%30.1–36.0
Obesity among adults35.1%30.9–39.6
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.1%8.2–12.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.1–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.1%71.1–77.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.6%70.4–76.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.3–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%63.0–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.9%66.1–71.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%74.3–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.9–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%11.6–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%18.2–25.5
Short sleep duration among adults28.1%24.8–31.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%13.4–18.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%13.8–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults11.4%9.7–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.5–15.5
Any disability among adults26.3%22.8–30.0
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Independent living disability among adults6.8%5.8–8.0
Mobility disability among adults10.4%8.7–12.2
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.2–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%18.1–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.3–14.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.5%5.9–9.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.1–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.4
Loneliness among adults31.0%27.5–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.9–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–6411.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription93.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate76.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population8.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households53.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+13.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age42.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$100,798$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$267,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$2,171$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured