Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55309

in Big Lake, MinnesotaPopulation 21,378

59.21/ 100

Ranked #5,433 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #150 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #115 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

23.2%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.9%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

26.5%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.8%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.4%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

22.5 mi

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.8%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.3%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.3%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.1%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

Big Lake, Minnesota (ZIP 55309), on the composite measure, lands in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,433rd) and the top 17% of Minnesota (150th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled high cholesterol registers in the bottom 3.3% nationally, high blood pressure lands in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and short sleep resides in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 5.1% nationally, mobility disability settles in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and stroke stands in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled diabetes is in the bottom 4.6% nationally. On the other hand, modeled binge drinking rests in the top 1.1% nationally, and distance to a community health center sits in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled fine-particle registers in the top 7.6% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 55330, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 25.6; chronic-disease standing 93.4 (top 10%) — 68 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,187 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.6%17.3–22.0
High blood pressure among adults26.5%23.4–29.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.9%6.3–7.6
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Depression among adults24.7%21.4–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.9%26.7–33.4
Obesity among adults38.5%32.9–44.2
Stroke among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.8%5.5–8.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.7–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.6%68.2–74.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.9%67.1–74.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.4–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.5%61.2–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.1%66.0–72.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.0%74.1–85.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults23.2%19.8–26.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.8%11.9–16.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%18.5–25.3
Short sleep duration among adults28.8%24.6–33.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.5%11.8–15.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.5–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.4%9.2–11.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.4–14.6
Any disability among adults25.6%22.4–29.1
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.9
Mobility disability among adults8.8%7.6–10.1
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.3–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%17.9–24.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.3–11.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.5–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.6–7.2
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.1–34.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription95.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate90.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population3.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households44.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+8.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age36.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$121,711$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$361,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,408$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 1.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.28 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured