Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54726

in Boyd, WisconsinPopulation 1,866

46.93/ 100

Ranked #20,244 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #693 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 9.2%)

Ranked #16 of 16 Eau Claire, WI ZIPs (bottom 6.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.4%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

32.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

78.8%

in the bottom 14.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Boyd, Wisconsin (ZIP 54726) lands in the bottom 37% nationally (20,244th) and the bottom 9.2% of Wisconsin (693rd).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled humid heat is in the bottom 16% nationally, and unemployment settles in the bottom 21% nationally. Set against that, walkability resides in the bottom 7.5% nationally, and modeled binge drinking registers in the top 8.8% nationally. Fatal road crashes rests in the top 11.6% nationally, modeled obesity stands in the top 9.0% nationally, and modeled fine-particle lies in the top 14.0% nationally. Home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 14.8% nationally. Recreation sits at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians is at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 54722, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Eau Claire, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%26.2–32.0
High blood pressure among adults35.4%31.9–38.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.6
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.4–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Depression among adults25.8%22.5–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%11.0–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%32.0–39.1
Obesity among adults43.0%37.0–49.1
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.2%10.0–14.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.7–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%75.1–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.8–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.0%82.2–85.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%63.2–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.1%59.8–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%66.2–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.4%16.6–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.7%16.3–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.5%27.3–35.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%28.9–39.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%19.1–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.6–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.6–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.8–17.4
Any disability among adults35.5%31.6–39.3
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.2–8.9
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Mobility disability among adults15.5%13.7–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.9–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.1–16.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.3%14.1–18.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.6–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Loneliness among adults31.2%27.7–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.7–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6414.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)12.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription78.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate82.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households50.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+14.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age37.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$78,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$192,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,099$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.1 yr ± 0.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.97 years of 82.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured