Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54738

in Eleva, WisconsinPopulation 3,784

58.29/ 100

Ranked #6,159 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #147 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #1 of 16 Eau Claire, WI ZIPs (top 6.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.28 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

7.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.83 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.5%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.3%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.28 per 1,000 residents

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

2.0%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Eleva, Wisconsin (ZIP 54738) places in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,159th) and the top 19% of Wisconsin (147th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: mental-health providers rests in the top 2.4% nationally, and civic resides in the top 5.8% nationally. Recreation is in the top 7.1% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff lands in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the top 5.2% nationally, transportation registers in the bottom 13.7% nationally, and tooth loss settles in the bottom 11.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled nitrate sits in the top 3.5% nationally, binge drinking lies in the top 9.3% nationally, and fine-particle rests in the top 14.1% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Among the ZIPs nearby, none ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Eau Claire, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.5%25.4–29.9
High blood pressure among adults33.0%30.4–35.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.7–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.5–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.4–7.1
Depression among adults23.8%21.5–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.6–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%32.7–38.0
Obesity among adults34.5%30.4–39.0
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.6%6.4–8.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.6–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%76.2–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%75.5–80.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.8–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.6%67.3–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.2%68.8–73.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.5%76.9–85.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.3%17.2–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.2–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.9%21.6–28.3
Short sleep duration among adults34.0%30.0–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.7%13.7–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.6–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.2–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.6–13.3
Any disability among adults28.0%25.0–31.1
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Mobility disability among adults12.5%11.0–14.1
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%17.4–22.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.9–11.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.0–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Loneliness among adults29.1%25.9–32.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–644.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)5.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)1.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription89.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate72.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population10.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households48.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age38.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$95,179$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$290,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$957$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 0.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.97 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured