Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54739

in Elk Mound, WisconsinPopulation 5,549

56.32/ 100

Ranked #7,953 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #230 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

5.4%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.2%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.3%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

95.3%

in the top 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Elk Mound, Wisconsin (ZIP 54739) lands in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,953rd) and the top 30% of Wisconsin (230th).

continue reading

A handful of measures stand out most sharply across the profile here: modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 12.2% nationally, and tooth loss settles in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled mammography resides in the top 11.7% nationally, and high cholesterol registers in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 14.7% nationally, and stroke stands in the bottom 15.0% nationally. On the other side, modeled nitrate lies in the top 4.1% nationally, binge drinking lands in the top 4.8% nationally, and fine-particle sits in the top 7.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 54701, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.8–27.4
High blood pressure among adults31.0%28.0–33.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.5–8.8
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.8–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Depression among adults24.2%21.4–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%9.0–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%30.2–36.3
Obesity among adults40.3%34.8–45.7
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.3%6.1–8.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.6–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%73.5–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.9%72.9–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.4–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%64.5–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.4%65.8–71.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%74.7–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%17.6–23.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%12.5–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%22.3–29.1
Short sleep duration among adults33.9%29.5–38.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%14.2–18.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%14.1–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.2–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.5%11.2–14.0
Any disability among adults28.3%25.1–31.5
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.4–8.0
Mobility disability among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.3–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.3–11.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.6–12.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.3–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.7
Loneliness among adults30.0%26.2–34.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–646.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription95.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate76.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+13.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age38.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$88,667$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$260,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,091$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured