Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54410

in Arpin, WisconsinPopulation 2,611

52.87/ 100

Ranked #12,272 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #434 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

20.3%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3 pCi/L

in the top 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

93%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.3%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST70th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Arpin, Wisconsin (ZIP 54410), overall, ranks in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,272nd) and the bottom 43% of Wisconsin (434th).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: modeled loneliness is in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Homeownership lands in the top 11.6% nationally, and modeled mammography lies in the top 9.6% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff stands in the bottom 16% nationally, and humid heat rests in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking registers in the top 5.2% nationally, and walkability resides in the bottom 8.6% nationally. Modeled radon settles in the top 10.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 54449, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.5%26.5–32.4
High blood pressure among adults35.2%31.7–38.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.6–8.5
Depression among adults23.2%20.1–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.7–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%31.9–38.9
Obesity among adults40.9%35.5–46.1
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.6–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.3–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.3–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.1%73.8–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%85.0–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.9%64.5–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%61.2–67.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.3%74.0–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.3%17.3–23.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%14.2–18.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%24.0–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%27.3–36.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%16.1–21.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.3–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.6–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%11.9–15.2
Any disability among adults30.9%27.3–34.6
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.6–16.4
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%18.0–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.6–13.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.3–14.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Loneliness among adults28.6%24.7–32.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.4–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6415.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate93.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households65.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+13.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age43.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$84,135$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$213,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$789$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured