Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54467

in Plover, WisconsinPopulation 14,870

58.46/ 100

Ranked #6,027 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #140 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

78.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

8.9%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.1%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.4%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.6%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

149 units

in the top 14.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.67 per 1,000 residents

in the top 15.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.4%

in the bottom 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.067 per 1,000 residents

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

11.1%

in the bottom 14.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Plover, Wisconsin (ZIP 54467) places in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,027th) and the top 18% of Wisconsin (140th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled mammography lies in the top 5.5% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff resides in the bottom 10.9% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing is in the top 14.5% nationally. Modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 14.8% nationally, dental providers stands in the top 15.0% nationally, and modeled diabetes registers in the bottom 11.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas settles in the top 2.1% nationally, nitrate sits in the top 3.3% nationally, and binge drinking lies in the top 5.8% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 54482, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 7.8 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 80.7 — 73 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,651 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.5%22.1–26.9
High blood pressure among adults28.6%25.9–31.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.7–9.2
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.6–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Depression among adults24.1%21.3–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.4%8.2–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.3%31.2–37.5
Obesity among adults35.2%30.5–40.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.1–10.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.5%6.3–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.3–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%74.8–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.1–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.8%66.2–74.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.5%67.3–73.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.4%75.0–86.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.1%17.4–23.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%11.0–14.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.1%20.9–27.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%27.3–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%14.1–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.8–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.5–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Any disability among adults27.6%24.5–31.0
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Mobility disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.7
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.8%16.2–21.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.2–12.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.9–12.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.7
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.3–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–649.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)8.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription94.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate61.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population4.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households55.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+15.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age36.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$87,580$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$268,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,086$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured