Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54169

in Sherwood, WisconsinPopulation 3,252

62.61/ 100

Ranked #3,176 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.0%)

Ranked #55 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 7.3%)

Ranked #2 of 23 Appleton, WI ZIPs (top 8.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

21%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.0%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.5%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.8%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96.7%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.06%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

60.2%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.2%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Sherwood, Wisconsin (ZIP 54169), on the composite measure, lands in the top 10.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,176th) and the top 7.3% of Wisconsin (55th).

continue reading

Reading across the measures, this area's clearest strengths come through: modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 3.8% nationally, loneliness lands in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and transportation resides in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 5.4% nationally, modeled housing insecurity settles in the bottom 6.0% nationally, and homeownership stands in the top 6.7% nationally. Floodplain exposure is in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and modeled mammography rests in the top 6.1% nationally. By contrast, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 3.3% nationally, and pfas registers in the top 7.9% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 54913, about 7.2 miles away. Across the board, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Appleton, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.7%22.6–29.1
High blood pressure among adults30.1%26.5–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.8–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.3–6.4
Depression among adults23.4%20.0–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.6%8.1–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.7%29.7–38.0
Obesity among adults32.9%26.3–39.9
Stroke among adults2.7%2.4–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.2%5.9–8.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%3.9–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%74.6–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.6–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%86.8–90.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.9%65.8–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.3%71.6–76.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.2%75.6–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.0%17.5–24.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%8.9–14.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.4%18.2–27.3
Short sleep duration among adults31.3%26.4–36.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.4%11.0–16.3
Frequent mental distress among adults14.4%12.4–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults11.4%9.6–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%8.9–12.6
Any disability among adults24.3%20.5–28.8
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.1–6.7
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.1–7.3
Mobility disability among adults10.5%8.6–12.8
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.3–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.2%2.7–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.3%14.2–20.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.5%5.5–9.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%5.5–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.3–8.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.8–5.7
Loneliness among adults27.4%22.8–32.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.1–5.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–641.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)2.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)0.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription96.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate96.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households58.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$109,524$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$351,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,173$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth87.2 yr ± 3.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.19 years of 87.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured