Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54026

in Star Prairie, WisconsinPopulation 2,361

58.02/ 100

Ranked #6,380 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #159 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

20.8%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.3%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.5%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

96.7%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

92.1%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

0.73%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Star Prairie, Wisconsin (ZIP 54026), in overall standing, comes out in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,380th) and the top 21% of Wisconsin (159th).

continue reading

A healthy showing across the board, and a few measures carry it: modeled utility shutoff resides in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription stands in the top 11.6% nationally, and modeled transportation resides in the bottom 12.4% nationally. Modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 13.0% nationally, and homeownership stands in the top 13.4% nationally. Modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 13.4% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 13.5% nationally. On the other hand, modeled binge drinking stands in the top 3.7% nationally, and fine-particle resides in the top 7.6% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 54001, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%24.6–29.4
High blood pressure among adults32.8%30.0–35.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.1–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.6–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Depression among adults22.6%20.1–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%9.3–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%32.8–38.7
Obesity among adults35.9%31.3–40.5
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.9%6.6–9.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.1–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.7–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%73.5–78.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%86.0–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.6%67.1–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.8%67.3–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.0%75.3–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.8%18.3–23.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.9%12.0–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.3%21.0–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%26.9–34.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.6–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.5–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%11.0–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.7–13.4
Any disability among adults27.4%24.3–30.4
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.3
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%17.2–21.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.8–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Loneliness among adults29.1%26.1–32.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.5%4.0–5.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription96.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate92.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households56.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+19.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age46.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$95,833$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$342,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,308$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 1.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.02 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured