Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54166

in Shawano, WisconsinPopulation 16,940

50.96/ 100

Ranked #14,906 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #524 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

9.2%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

8.6%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Shawano, Wisconsin (ZIP 54166) ranks in the top 46% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,906th) and the bottom 31% of Wisconsin (524th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Elder services lies in the top 8.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Childcare sits in the top 16% nationally, dental providers is in the top 16% nationally, and mental-health providers settles in the top 17% nationally. Set against that, modeled expected annual loss resides in the top 3.2% nationally, disaster risk registers in the top 7.0% nationally, and fine-particle rests in the top 14.5% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands in the top 17% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Close by, ZIP 54107, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%28.2–34.8
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.4–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Depression among adults22.3%19.1–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.5–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%33.1–41.3
Obesity among adults40.7%33.7–47.6
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.2–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%7.1–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.1–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.8–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.2–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%63.4–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.4%61.3–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%69.1–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%14.6–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.7–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.7%26.4–35.3
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%28.9–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%18.3–23.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.5–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.4–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.8–16.1
Any disability among adults32.9%29.0–37.0
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.8
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.6%14.6–18.8
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.6–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.1–16.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.5%13.5–17.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.1–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Loneliness among adults31.0%26.5–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–648.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)5.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle9.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription87.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate70.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households59.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+22.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$62,791$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$190,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$838$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured