Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53128

in Genoa City, WisconsinPopulation 9,030

53.34/ 100

Ranked #11,580 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #403 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

21.4%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.23%

in the bottom 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

53.7%

in the top 11.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

3.7%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Genoa City, Wisconsin (ZIP 53128) lands in the top 36% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,580th) and the bottom 47% of Wisconsin (403rd).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 10.9% nationally, and high cholesterol resides in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lands in the bottom 14.7% nationally, and hearing disability registers in the bottom 21% nationally. Against that, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 2.5% nationally, and pfas rests in the top 11.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation stands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband settles in the bottom 20% nationally, and crowded housing lies in the top 20% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 53105, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.0%22.5–27.6
High blood pressure among adults31.0%27.8–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.4–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Depression among adults23.7%20.8–26.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%9.2–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%29.8–36.6
Obesity among adults40.2%34.2–46.2
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%8.1–11.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.7–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.2%72.3–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.7–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.3–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.5%63.4–71.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.9%60.9–66.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%71.5–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.4%18.4–24.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.5–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%23.3–31.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%29.6–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%15.7–20.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.1–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.2–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.6–16.1
Any disability among adults30.0%26.4–33.8
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.2
Mobility disability among adults13.0%11.4–14.8
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%19.2–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.7–14.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.9–15.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.0–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.2–8.0
Loneliness among adults32.3%28.3–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.9–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–646.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)9.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate87.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population6.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households57.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+16.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age39.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$82,216$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$244,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,226$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured