Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53181

in Twin Lakes, WisconsinPopulation 7,964

55.89/ 100

Ranked #8,395 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #252 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #5 of 11 Kenosha, WI ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

20.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.7%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

53.2%

in the top 11.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.43%

in the bottom 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Twin Lakes, Wisconsin (ZIP 53181) ranks in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,395th) and the top 33% of Wisconsin (252nd).

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise rests in the bottom 14.3% nationally, grocery is in the top 14.4% nationally, and modeled mammography stands in the top 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure settles at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation lies in the bottom 19% nationally, and food insecurity resides in the bottom 19% nationally. Against that, modeled binge drinking lands in the top 4.8% nationally, and pfas registers in the top 11.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 53105, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kenosha, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.7%25.4–32.0
High blood pressure among adults33.4%29.6–37.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%5.5–7.5
Depression among adults25.0%21.6–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.1–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.1%30.3–38.0
Obesity among adults39.2%33.6–45.0
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.9%7.1–10.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.6–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.1–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%73.2–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.0–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.4%64.1–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.9%63.8–69.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%72.9–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%17.1–24.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.3–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%21.0–29.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%30.0–38.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%14.2–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%13.9–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.1–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.5%10.9–14.5
Any disability among adults28.7%24.8–32.8
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.5
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.4
Mobility disability among adults12.4%10.5–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.0–23.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%7.9–11.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.3–12.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.1–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.9–6.7
Loneliness among adults29.7%25.5–33.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.9–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–643.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)5.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle6.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate80.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households62.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+21.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age50.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$97,804$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$293,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$867$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 1.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.38 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured