Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54944

in Hortonville, WisconsinPopulation 9,312

56.69/ 100

Ranked #7,562 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #215 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #8 of 23 Appleton, WI ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

22.1%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.7%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.4%

in the bottom 11.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

8.3%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Hortonville, Wisconsin (ZIP 54944) ranks in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,562nd) and the top 28% of Wisconsin (215th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 9.7% nationally, and poverty sits in the bottom 11.4% nationally. Modeled mammography rests in the top 11.1% nationally, and transportation is in the bottom 13.7% nationally. Modeled humid heat stands in the bottom 15% nationally, short sleep settles in the bottom 17% nationally, and food insecurity lies in the bottom 18% nationally. Modeled hearing disability resides in the bottom 18% nationally. Against that, modeled binge drinking lands in the top 1.8% nationally, and fine-particle registers in the top 14.5% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 54913, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Appleton, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.6%24.9–30.3
High blood pressure among adults33.7%30.4–36.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Depression among adults24.5%21.3–27.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%32.2–39.0
Obesity among adults37.6%32.5–42.5
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.3%7.5–11.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.3–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.0–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.8–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.2–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.9%66.7–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%67.5–73.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.0%73.8–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults22.1%18.9–25.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.6–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%21.8–28.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.5%26.9–36.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%13.9–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%14.0–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.2–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.8–13.8
Any disability among adults26.4%23.2–29.7
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.2–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.3–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.0%16.5–21.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.1–11.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.3–11.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.9–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.8–6.3
Loneliness among adults30.8%27.2–34.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)1.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle1.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription92.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate86.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households58.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+18.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age44.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$100,523$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$346,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$924$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured