Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52563

in Hedrick, IowaPopulation 1,602

48.95/ 100

Ranked #17,737 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #739 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.7%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.2%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST36th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

0.4 mi

in the bottom 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US28th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Hedrick, Iowa (ZIP 52563) places in the bottom 45% nationally (17,737th) and the bottom 20% of Iowa (739th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled pfas rests in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 14.7% nationally. Recreation is in the top 17% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled radon lands in the top 5.0% nationally, binge drinking stands in the top 9.8% nationally, and disaster risk registers in the top 14.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic sits in the top 17% nationally, obesity lies in the top 16% nationally, and energy burden rests in the top 14.2% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 52561, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.5%27.6–33.4
High blood pressure among adults38.3%34.8–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.7
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
Depression among adults21.7%18.8–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.5–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%33.7–40.9
Obesity among adults41.4%35.0–47.8
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%11.8–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.9–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.4–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%74.8–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.4%82.6–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%63.9–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%60.2–66.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.6%69.0–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.2%16.4–22.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.6%15.3–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.3%24.4–32.5
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%28.0–38.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.1%17.7–22.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.4–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%13.0–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%13.1–16.5
Any disability among adults31.6%28.0–35.6
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.8
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.6–17.4
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%20.4–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.9–15.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.9–14.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.2–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.3–8.2
Loneliness among adults32.5%28.8–37.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.0–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–643.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate82.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households44.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age41.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$98,438$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$130,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$675$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 1.3578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.35 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured