Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52254

in Lost Nation, IowaPopulation 1,004

49.89/ 100

Ranked #16,403 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #676 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.8%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

24.7 mi

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.1%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

18.4%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.14%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.0%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

19.9%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Lost Nation, Iowa (ZIP 52254), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 49% nationally (16,403rd) and the bottom 27% of Iowa (676th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: distance to a community health center lands in the top 5.8% nationally, modeled binge drinking is in the top 5.8% nationally, and modeled arsenic resides in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled radon rests in the top 11.6% nationally, and energy burden lies in the top 9.1% nationally. More encouragingly, fatal road crashes sits at the national minimum, and fiber broadband settles in the top 2.5% nationally. Civic registers in the top 3.2% nationally, and modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 52037, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.2%28.6–35.8
High blood pressure among adults39.6%35.1–43.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.5
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.2–9.6
Depression among adults19.6%16.5–22.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%10.9–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%34.2–43.0
Obesity among adults38.7%31.4–45.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.0–12.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.5–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.1–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.0–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.6–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%60.8–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.0%62.3–69.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%69.9–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.1%16.7–23.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%13.8–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%22.6–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.3%27.5–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.9%16.2–21.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.3–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.7–15.1
Any disability among adults30.3%26.1–34.6
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.0–9.1
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.0–17.6
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.3–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.1–13.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.9–11.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.3
Loneliness among adults31.2%26.5–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–6411.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)5.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription81.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate67.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households54.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+15.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age29.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$64,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$113,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,188$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured