Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52221

in Guernsey, IowaPopulation 332

50.65/ 100

Ranked #15,334 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #605 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

4.6%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

96.6%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

19.2 mi

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

15.6%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

14.9 mi

in the top 11.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.3%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

8.8%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Guernsey, Iowa (ZIP 52221) sits in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,334th) and the bottom 34% of Iowa (605th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled pfas lands in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband settles in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled radon rests in the top 8.8% nationally, and distance to a community health center settles in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled arsenic lands in the top 9.4% nationally, and distance to an emergency room rests in the top 11.2% nationally. Modeled binge drinking settles in the top 11.9% nationally, and energy burden lands in the top 10.3% nationally.

Put plainly, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 50171, about 1.0 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%26.9–33.4
High blood pressure among adults38.7%34.7–42.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.5–11.7
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.3–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.0–9.5
Depression among adults20.1%17.0–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.8–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.0–42.0
Obesity among adults41.3%34.0–48.2
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.0–14.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.8–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.1–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%74.4–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.6–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.1%59.2–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.5–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%68.9–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.9%15.9–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.2–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%22.8–31.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%26.1–37.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%16.4–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.8–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%11.9–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%11.8–15.5
Any disability among adults31.8%27.5–36.0
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.0–11.6
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Mobility disability among adults15.1%12.9–17.6
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.7–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.1–13.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.6–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.0–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.3
Loneliness among adults31.7%27.2–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–642.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle8.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription94.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate82.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age29.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$86,473$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$228,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,667$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured