Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52323

in Oxford Junction, IowaPopulation 942

49.13/ 100

Ranked #17,479 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #732 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #44 of 46 Cedar Rapids, IA ZIPs (bottom 4.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Civic-institution access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

29.9 mi

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

46.9%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.7%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.3%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

69.6%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.5%

in the bottom 10.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$41,425

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Oxford Junction, Iowa (ZIP 52323) ranks in the bottom 45% nationally (17,479th) and the bottom 21% of Iowa (732nd).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: civic registers in the top 2.4% nationally, and fiber broadband lies in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled transportation noise is in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and pfas registers in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 10.3% nationally. On the other side, distance to a community health center is in the top 4.1% nationally, housing-cost burden registers in the top 4.4% nationally, and modeled energy burden lies in the top 4.0% nationally. Home broadband subscription is in the bottom 6.0% nationally, and modeled arsenic registers in the top 10.7% nationally.

For context, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 52207, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cedar Rapids, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.2–35.9
High blood pressure among adults40.2%36.3–44.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.2–12.3
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.9–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.6–10.1
Depression among adults19.7%16.9–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.6%11.8–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.4–43.7
Obesity among adults40.2%32.9–47.5
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.6–15.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.0–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.0%79.4–84.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.6–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.5–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.3%64.9–73.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.3%60.9–67.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%71.1–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.7%15.8–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%13.8–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.7%22.4–31.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%28.7–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%16.6–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.6–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.6–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.4–14.7
Any disability among adults30.8%26.9–34.8
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Mobility disability among adults15.6%13.6–17.8
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.5–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.0–13.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.8–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.7–9.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.2–7.0
Loneliness among adults28.5%24.3–33.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–644.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)1.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)3.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription69.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate73.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households42.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+26.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age54.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$41,425$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$85,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$739$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 1.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.62 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured