Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52228

in Fairfax, IowaPopulation 3,802

60.27/ 100

Ranked #4,657 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.6%)

Ranked #59 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 6.4%)

Ranked #9 of 46 Cedar Rapids, IA ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.8%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.4%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.7%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$118,125

in the top 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.1%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.5%

in the bottom 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Fairfax, Iowa (ZIP 52228), overall, ranks in the top 14.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,657th) and the top 6.4% of Iowa (59th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: fiber broadband is in the top 2.0% nationally, modeled mammography sits in the top 5.5% nationally, and modeled transportation lands in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 9.5% nationally, modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 10.5% nationally, and recreation rests in the top 11.5% nationally. Modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 11.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 3.7% nationally, and loud transportation noise settles in the top 10.0% nationally. Modeled radon is in the top 12.4% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 52338, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cedar Rapids, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 22.9; chronic-disease standing 76.7 — 54 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,782 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%24.8–29.8
High blood pressure among adults31.3%28.5–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Depression among adults22.7%20.1–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%32.2–38.5
Obesity among adults34.8%30.9–39.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%6.0–9.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.2–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.3–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%76.2–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.7–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.3%65.4–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.6%69.9–75.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.4%76.0–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.8%18.2–23.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.9%10.9–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.5%17.9–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults30.2%26.5–34.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.5%12.8–16.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.6–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults11.7%10.4–13.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Any disability among adults25.3%22.6–28.4
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.5–12.3
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%20.0–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.3–10.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.5–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.1–8.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.4–5.8
Loneliness among adults31.3%27.9–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.4–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–643.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate91.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households43.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+14.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age40.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$118,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$308,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,167$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.9 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 83.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured