Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52338

in Shueyville, IowaPopulation 3,934

63.85/ 100

Ranked #2,539 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.0%)

Ranked #17 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 1.9%)

Ranked #5 of 21 Iowa City, IA ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

22.3%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.87 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.3%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.0%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.5%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.2%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Park land

23.9%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

Shueyville, Iowa (ZIP 52338) ranks in the top 8.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,539th) and the top 1.9% of Iowa (17th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: fiber broadband is in the top 2.0% nationally, and childcare registers in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and food insecurity is in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled transportation registers in the bottom 3.8% nationally, mammography lies in the top 2.1% nationally, and utility shutoff is in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Park land registers in the top 5.9% nationally, and modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking is in the top 1.6% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 52317, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Iowa City, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.8%23.0–28.9
High blood pressure among adults33.3%30.0–36.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.5
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.8–6.7
Depression among adults19.8%17.2–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.6–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%31.9–38.9
Obesity among adults31.2%27.0–36.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.5–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.6%6.1–9.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.6–5.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%76.6–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.9–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.7–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.2%64.9–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.8%72.1–77.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.2%77.8–87.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults22.3%19.4–25.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%9.4–14.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.8%13.9–20.2
Short sleep duration among adults29.0%25.1–33.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.4%11.3–15.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.4–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.3–12.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%9.2–12.3
Any disability among adults22.3%19.2–25.7
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Independent living disability among adults5.6%4.8–6.5
Mobility disability among adults10.2%8.6–12.0
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.3–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.7–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%18.1–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.6–8.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.2–6.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.1–7.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.8–5.3
Loneliness among adults28.8%25.3–32.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.6–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–641.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)2.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate93.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households62.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age45.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$119,605$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$392,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,215$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.9 yr ± 1.5378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.53 years of 81.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured