Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51562

in Panama, IowaPopulation 506

49.74/ 100

Ranked #16,603 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #688 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.8 pCi/L

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

32.3 mi

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.71%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.6%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.0%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

96.7%

in the top 11.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

34.4%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Panama, Iowa (ZIP 51562), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 48% nationally (16,603rd) and the bottom 25% of Iowa (688th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled radon settles in the top 0.4% nationally, distance to a community health center lands in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled nitrate rests in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled binge drinking settles in the top 7.9% nationally, and energy burden lands in the top 8.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Better still, outpatient settles in the top 0.3% nationally, and civic lands in the top 0.9% nationally. Home broadband subscription rests in the top 11.3% nationally. Crowded housing settles at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs.

Set within its surrounding area, outpatient runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 51529, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%28.2–35.4
High blood pressure among adults37.7%33.5–42.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.0–9.4
Depression among adults20.6%17.5–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.7–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.4%34.1–43.0
Obesity among adults39.0%31.4–47.2
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.3–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%4.9–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%77.7–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.5–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.2–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.6%60.4–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.1%61.5–68.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%69.7–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.6%16.3–23.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%13.9–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.8%22.2–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.0%25.9–38.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%16.5–22.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.2–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.3–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.7–15.3
Any disability among adults31.1%26.7–35.5
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.9%12.6–17.1
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.6–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.8–13.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.7–11.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.0–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Loneliness among adults30.2%25.5–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.1–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–641.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)0.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription96.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate87.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households44.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age50.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$81,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$159,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$940$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 1.3078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.30 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured