Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50539

in Fenton, IowaPopulation 444

48.73/ 100

Ranked #18,031 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #750 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.7 pCi/L

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

38.3%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

6.1%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

32.9 mi

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.7%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

12.8%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.01%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

6.8 ppb

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US94th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.3%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

58.9 mi

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Fenton, Iowa (ZIP 50539), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 44% nationally (18,031st) and the bottom 19% of Iowa (750th).

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled radon resides in the top 3.2% nationally, and arsenic is in the top 1.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled energy burden stands in the top 4.0% nationally. Unemployment registers in the top 5.5% nationally, and lead in tap water settles in the top 6.3% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled pfas sits in the bottom 2.1% nationally, modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 7.5% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 9.0% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 50514, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.8%28.6–35.4
High blood pressure among adults39.3%35.4–43.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.8–11.8
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.8–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.6–10.3
Depression among adults20.4%17.6–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.0–15.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%34.9–43.1
Obesity among adults40.1%33.0–47.5
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.4%10.1–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.4–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.1–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.5–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.4–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%65.7–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.4%59.0–65.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.1%72.6–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%16.3–22.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%13.9–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%22.7–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.4%29.5–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%17.1–22.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.3–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.6–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.1–15.6
Any disability among adults31.3%27.1–35.5
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.0–9.1
Mobility disability among adults15.5%13.3–17.9
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%18.9–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.6–13.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.4–12.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
Loneliness among adults30.0%25.8–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)12.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle7.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate93.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households67.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+28.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age44.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$65,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$70,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$760$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured