Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51401

in Carroll, IowaPopulation 11,990

52.94/ 100

Ranked #12,164 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #416 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.4 pCi/L

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

33.7 mi

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.9%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

7.8 ppb

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US95th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

8.3%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

111 units

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Carroll, Iowa (ZIP 51401) sits in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,164th) and the top 45% of Iowa (416th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: fiber broadband is in the top 5.1% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Elder services sits in the top 9.1% nationally, and modeled short sleep registers in the bottom 10.5% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon lands in the top 0.9% nationally, and expected annual loss resides in the top 3.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled disaster risk settles in the top 4.3% nationally. Lead in tap water stands in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled transportation noise is in the top 11.6% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 51455, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%27.3–34.3
High blood pressure among adults37.9%33.8–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.5–11.5
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Depression among adults19.7%16.7–23.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.5–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.5–42.0
Obesity among adults39.9%32.5–47.8
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.2–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.6–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%78.0–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.1–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.3–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.5%63.5–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.5%65.0–71.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%70.3–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%15.9–22.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.2%12.7–17.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%23.1–32.7
Short sleep duration among adults30.2%24.4–36.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%16.0–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.8–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.1–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.6–15.2
Any disability among adults29.5%25.4–33.9
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.5–16.9
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%18.9–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.5–13.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.2–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.3–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.6–7.3
Loneliness among adults30.1%25.6–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.2–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–645.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)4.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription87.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate73.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households53.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+23.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$70,702$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$195,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$726$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured