Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51455

in Manning, IowaPopulation 2,279

53.52/ 100

Ranked #11,339 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #377 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

5.1 pCi/L

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

45.2 mi

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.33%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.7%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.2%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

30%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

Manning, Iowa (ZIP 51455), by its overall standing, sits in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,339th) and the top 41% of Iowa (377th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: mental-health providers rests in the top 1.0% nationally, pharmacy lies in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled pfas sits in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Outpatient settles in the top 9.3% nationally, and modeled short sleep registers in the bottom 9.7% nationally. By contrast, modeled radon stands in the top 0.2% nationally, and distance to a community health center lands in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled binge drinking is in the top 6.6% nationally, and nitrate resides in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled energy burden rests in the top 7.1% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 51446, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%27.2–33.2
High blood pressure among adults37.0%33.5–40.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.8–11.7
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.3–8.5
Depression among adults19.5%17.0–22.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.0–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.9–41.4
Obesity among adults38.2%31.8–45.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.2–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.7–11.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.8–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%78.3–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.4–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%84.9–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.0%66.7–75.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.3%65.1–71.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%71.5–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.9%17.1–23.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%12.0–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%21.5–29.8
Short sleep duration among adults30.0%25.0–35.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.2%14.8–19.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.6–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.6–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%11.1–14.4
Any disability among adults28.3%24.6–32.1
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.2
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.6–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%19.2–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.8–11.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.2–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.3–8.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.8–6.3
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.2–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.4–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–643.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)2.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription90.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate82.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households67.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+21.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age43.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$76,786$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$132,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$700$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.3 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 82.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured