Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

58067

in Rutland, North DakotaPopulation 277

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

54.24/ 100

Ranked #10,389 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #187 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a community health center

38.8 mi

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.1%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

93.9 mi

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.3%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.9%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

17.5 mi

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.10%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Rutland, North Dakota (ZIP 58067) ranks in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,389th) and the bottom 50% of North Dakota (187th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 4.0% nationally. Fiber broadband rests in the top 4.1% nationally, and modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Lithium in drinking water lies in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Set against that, distance to a community health center lands in the top 2.3% nationally, modeled radon sits in the top 4.9% nationally, and modeled fine-particle is in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled binge drinking settles in the top 6.2% nationally, and distance to an emergency room resides in the top 7.7% nationally.

To spell things out, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Close by, ZIP 58032, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%27.1–34.8
High blood pressure among adults37.4%32.7–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.5–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.1–8.7
Depression among adults19.8%16.5–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.2–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%34.3–44.1
Obesity among adults41.8%33.0–51.3
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.5–11.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.0–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%77.4–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.7%72.7–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.4–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.7%66.4–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.1%63.3–70.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%71.2–85.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.0%16.4–24.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%11.6–17.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%19.3–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.1%25.9–39.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.3%14.4–20.7
Frequent mental distress among adults13.1%11.3–15.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.2–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.6%9.8–13.8
Any disability among adults29.2%24.8–34.2
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
Independent living disability among adults6.9%5.9–8.2
Mobility disability among adults13.3%11.2–15.9
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.0–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.5–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.6%17.2–24.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.1–11.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.4–7.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.0–8.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.4–6.2
Loneliness among adults27.1%22.4–32.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–643.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)4.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)0.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription87.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate88.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households50.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+19.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age34.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$92,969$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$122,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$469$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 1.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.81 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured