Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51248

in Sanborn, IowaPopulation 1,534

47.83/ 100

Ranked #19,139 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #793 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 14.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

5.5 pCi/L

in the top 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

33.3%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.4%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

20.2 mi

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.08%

in the bottom 14.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.4%

in the top 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

8.9%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

  • USGS models a high likelihood that groundwater arsenic here exceeds 10 µg/L — the level EPA sets as the limit for public water systems — and this area's modeled radon runs above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level.

    See the full radon & arsenic analysis →

The read

By its overall health score, Sanborn, Iowa (ZIP 51248) lands in the bottom 40% nationally (19,139th) and the bottom 14.0% of Iowa (793rd).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled radon registers in the top 0.09% nationally, and arsenic sits in the top 2.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests in the top 8.1% nationally, and modeled fine-particle is in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled tree cover stands in the bottom 14.4% nationally, and hearing disability settles in the top 14.4% nationally. On the encouraging side, fiber broadband lies in the top 7.7% nationally, childcare resides in the top 8.8% nationally, and modeled pfas lands in the bottom 12.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs.

To translate a couple of terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 51201, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%28.8–35.9
High blood pressure among adults39.6%35.4–43.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%9.9–12.3
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.7–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.6–10.9
Depression among adults20.5%17.5–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.4–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%33.7–42.4
Obesity among adults38.7%31.3–46.7
Stroke among adults4.5%3.8–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%7.9–12.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.2–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%77.9–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.6–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.2–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%61.3–71.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.3%62.9–69.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%71.2–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%14.7–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%13.6–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%24.2–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.3%27.5–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.1%17.7–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.2–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%12.8–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.4–16.7
Any disability among adults34.1%29.4–39.0
Hearing disability among adults10.4%9.0–11.8
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.6–10.8
Mobility disability among adults17.1%14.3–20.3
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.7–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.6–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%18.9–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.4–15.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.3–14.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.7–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.0–8.3
Loneliness among adults31.2%26.4–36.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–644.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)4.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription82.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate76.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households68.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+36.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age47.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$64,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$172,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$954$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured