Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51231

in Archer, IowaPopulation 562

47.89/ 100

Ranked #19,067 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #787 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 14.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.6 pCi/L

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

39.7%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

33.4%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

29.7%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

18.9 mi

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.14%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.3%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.3%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

  • USGS models a high likelihood that groundwater arsenic here exceeds 10 µg/L — the level EPA sets as the limit for public water systems — and this area's modeled radon runs above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level.

    See the full radon & arsenic analysis →

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Archer, Iowa (ZIP 51231) sits in the bottom 41% nationally (19,067th) and the bottom 14.7% of Iowa (787th).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled radon registers in the top 0.6% nationally, crowded housing is in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled arsenic lies in the top 2.5% nationally. Poverty registers in the top 7.0% nationally, modeled fine-particle is in the top 8.6% nationally, and distance to a community health center lies in the top 8.9% nationally. On the better side, fiber broadband registers in the top 6.6% nationally. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 9.2% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 51201, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%26.3–33.5
High blood pressure among adults36.8%32.8–41.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.2–10.2
Depression among adults22.1%18.7–25.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.6–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%32.2–40.9
Obesity among adults40.0%32.2–48.4
Stroke among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.8%12.8–19.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.4–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.0–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%73.9–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%81.7–86.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.5%64.4–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.3%61.6–68.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%69.9–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.3%16.0–23.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%14.5–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.2%22.4–32.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%28.5–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%16.7–23.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.2–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.5–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.5–16.9
Any disability among adults31.2%26.8–36.1
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.1–9.8
Mobility disability among adults14.8%12.4–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%18.8–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%10.4–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.3%9.5–15.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.8–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.5
Loneliness among adults31.3%26.6–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.9–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate29.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–640.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)11.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription92.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate94.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)39.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households20.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+5.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age15.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$108,058$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$189,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 1.0578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.05 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured