Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51331

in Arnolds Park, IowaPopulation 935

58.99/ 100

Ranked #5,600 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #84 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 9.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Recreation access

3.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.5%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.7%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.3%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

31.6%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.91 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.0%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.0%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.91 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By its overall health score, Arnolds Park, Iowa (ZIP 51331) lands in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,600th) and the top 9.2% of Iowa (84th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: recreation rests in the top 0.4% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity is in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Modeled loneliness stands in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and transportation settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Childcare lies in the top 2.9% nationally, modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff lands in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Civic registers in the top 5.0% nationally. Against that, modeled arsenic sits in the top 2.8% nationally, and radon rests in the top 8.8% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, recreation runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 51363, about 8.6 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.3%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.2%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.0%30.1–38.1
High blood pressure among adults41.8%37.3–46.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.5%12.2–14.9
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.4–9.1
Depression among adults17.5%14.7–20.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.2–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.3%36.8–46.0
Obesity among adults36.9%29.4–44.6
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.8%6.2–9.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.4%3.5–5.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.6%82.0–86.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%79.4–85.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.4–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.2%69.8–78.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.2%72.3–78.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.5%73.9–86.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.4–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%9.4–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.8%18.6–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults29.9%24.5–36.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.1%13.4–18.9
Frequent mental distress among adults12.4%10.8–14.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%10.8–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%8.8–11.8
Any disability among adults28.2%24.0–32.7
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.3–7.2
Mobility disability among adults14.2%11.8–16.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.8–3.9
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%16.3–22.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.5–8.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.4–7.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.4–6.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.6–5.0
Loneliness among adults26.7%22.6–31.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.3–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–641.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)2.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription95.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate89.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households86.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+49.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age64.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$89,167$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$448,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$497$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.1 yr ± 1.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.61 years of 86.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured