Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51033

in Linn Grove, IowaPopulation 421

50.78/ 100

Ranked #15,168 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #593 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.6 pCi/L

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

39.8%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

69%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.7 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

8.9 mi

in the top 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

42.1%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.1%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

41.9%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

  • USGS models a high likelihood that groundwater arsenic here exceeds 10 µg/L — the level EPA sets as the limit for public water systems — and this area's modeled radon runs above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level.

    See the full radon & arsenic analysis →

The read

Linn Grove, Iowa (ZIP 51033) ranks in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,168th) and the bottom 36% of Iowa (593rd).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled transportation noise is in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep is in the bottom 14.0% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon registers in the top 0.7% nationally, modeled arsenic lies in the top 1.6% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Walkability registers in the bottom 5.8% nationally, modeled fine-particle lies in the top 11.7% nationally, and distance to a nursing home is in the top 13.6% nationally.

For context, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 50576, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.9%31.9–38.0
High blood pressure among adults41.9%38.4–45.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.0%11.0–13.0
Current asthma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
Depression among adults19.1%16.7–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%12.7–16.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.1%38.6–45.7
Obesity among adults37.8%32.5–43.5
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.3–14.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.6–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.5%81.3–85.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.9%79.5–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.2%88.0–90.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.3%63.3–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.6%65.9–71.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%69.5–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.9–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.5–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%24.0–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.9%26.9–35.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.3%17.7–23.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%13.0–16.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%13.2–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%11.0–14.0
Any disability among adults30.5%27.1–34.3
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.8–8.8
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.5–18.8
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.9–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.1–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.8–11.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.9–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.4–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%5.0–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)1.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription69.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate89.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households58.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+30.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age44.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$60,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$181,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,360$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 1.1478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.14 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured