Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51005

in Aurelia, IowaPopulation 1,561

56.93/ 100

Ranked #7,348 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #144 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

5.8 pCi/L

in the top 0.05% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

24.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.6%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.1%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.83%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.1%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.6%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

  • USGS models a high likelihood that groundwater arsenic here exceeds 10 µg/L — the level EPA sets as the limit for public water systems — and this area's modeled radon runs above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level.

    See the full radon & arsenic analysis →

The read

Aurelia, Iowa (ZIP 51005) ranks in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,348th) and the top 16% of Iowa (144th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: fatal road crashes sits at the national minimum, and modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the top 3.8% nationally, and housing insecurity sits in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff resides in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and transportation stands in the bottom 9.9% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon sits in the top 0.05% nationally, arsenic resides in the top 4.7% nationally, and nitrate stands in the top 6.7% nationally. Modeled fine-particle sits in the top 9.4% nationally.

For context, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Among the ZIPs nearby, none ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%26.1–32.9
High blood pressure among adults36.8%32.7–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.9–12.1
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.4–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%5.9–8.2
Depression among adults19.3%16.3–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.8–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%35.1–44.0
Obesity among adults36.7%29.5–44.7
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.4–12.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%5.1–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.6–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.3–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.7–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.2%67.6–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.2%68.2–74.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.1%75.9–87.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.7%15.6–22.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%10.9–15.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%20.6–29.8
Short sleep duration among adults28.6%23.3–34.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%13.9–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%12.8–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%11.0–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.3–13.7
Any disability among adults27.4%23.5–31.6
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Independent living disability among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Mobility disability among adults13.3%11.1–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.7–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.2–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.2–10.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.4–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.9–8.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–6.1
Loneliness among adults31.0%26.1–36.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–645.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription93.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate80.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population3.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households59.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+24.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age48.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$75,938$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$169,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$789$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured