Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51029

in Larrabee, IowaPopulation 261

53.35/ 100

Ranked #11,570 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #384 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.5 pCi/L

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

32.9%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.5%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

98.4%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.3%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.9%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

19.5 mi

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.6%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

30%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

  • USGS models a high likelihood that groundwater arsenic here exceeds 10 µg/L — the level EPA sets as the limit for public water systems — and this area's modeled radon runs above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level.

    See the full radon & arsenic analysis →

The read

Larrabee, Iowa (ZIP 51029), on the composite measure, lands in the top 36% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,570th) and the top 42% of Iowa (384th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: fiber broadband registers in the top 3.6% nationally, homeownership lands in the top 5.5% nationally, and modeled pfas resides in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the top 8.6% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon is in the top 0.9% nationally, and arsenic rests in the top 2.6% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits in the top 8.5% nationally, and modeled fine-particle registers in the top 9.1% nationally.

In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 51005, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.3%27.6–34.8
High blood pressure among adults40.2%35.8–44.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.9–12.1
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%6.9–9.7
Depression among adults19.6%16.5–22.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.4–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%36.8–46.1
Obesity among adults39.9%32.0–47.7
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.2–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%4.8–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.0%79.1–84.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%76.9–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.0%86.2–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.5%66.5–76.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.4%65.1–71.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%70.2–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.0–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%12.7–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.2%22.4–32.1
Short sleep duration among adults30.0%24.4–36.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%15.6–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.1–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%11.9–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.7–14.3
Any disability among adults28.6%24.2–32.9
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.2–8.4
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.2–17.0
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.2–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.4–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.3–12.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.7–10.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.4–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.8
Loneliness among adults30.0%25.1–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.6–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–648.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)2.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription97.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate98.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households71.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+26.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age55.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$86,042$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 1.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured