Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51022

in Granville, IowaPopulation 960

56.66/ 100

Ranked #7,586 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #153 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

5.7 pCi/L

in the top 0.05% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

33.9%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

6.4%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

7.3%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.1%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

5.5%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.15%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.4%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

  • USGS models a high likelihood that groundwater arsenic here exceeds 10 µg/L — the level EPA sets as the limit for public water systems — and this area's modeled radon runs above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level.

    See the full radon & arsenic analysis →

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Granville, Iowa (ZIP 51022) ranks in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,586th) and the top 17% of Iowa (153rd).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled pfas registers in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep rests in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and tooth loss is in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled radon lies in the top 0.05% nationally, arsenic resides in the top 2.4% nationally, and binge drinking lands in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled fine-particle registers in the top 8.1% nationally.

In plainer terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 51003, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.4%23.9–29.0
High blood pressure among adults35.0%31.9–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.1
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.8–7.4
Depression among adults20.1%17.5–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%33.4–40.2
Obesity among adults35.8%30.5–41.1
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.5%4.6–6.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%6.0–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.7–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%75.4–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.7–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.7%62.1–69.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.8%67.3–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.4%75.6–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.9%17.2–22.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%12.2–16.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.8%20.6–27.1
Short sleep duration among adults29.1%25.4–33.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.3%14.3–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.9–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%11.2–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%11.2–13.9
Any disability among adults26.3%23.3–29.3
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.6–8.0
Independent living disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.6–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%20.0–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.6–11.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.2–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.9–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.9–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–643.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)9.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)7.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription81.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate89.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+30.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$96,505$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$174,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.6 yr ± 1.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.28 years of 81.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured