Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52645

in New London, IowaPopulation 3,503

50.92/ 100

Ranked #14,955 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #577 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

9.2 µg/L

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.7%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.2%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST36th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

7.8%

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

New London, Iowa (ZIP 52645), by its overall standing, sits in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,955th) and the bottom 37% of Iowa (577th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: lithium in drinking water is in the bottom 1.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Crowded housing rests at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 15% nationally. By contrast, modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 9.8% nationally, and radon settles in the top 11.7% nationally. Modeled binge drinking registers in the top 9.8% nationally, and transportation noise stands in the top 12.6% nationally. Modeled arsenic lands in the top 14.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 52623, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.6%27.5–33.9
High blood pressure among adults38.2%34.3–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%7.1–9.4
Depression among adults21.0%18.0–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.0–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.6–41.7
Obesity among adults38.9%32.2–45.8
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%7.9–12.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.5–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.5–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%75.4–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.3%83.4–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%63.4–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.7%62.2–68.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%69.2–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.2%16.3–22.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%13.9–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.5%22.2–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%29.5–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%16.7–22.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.5–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.2–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.1–15.9
Any disability among adults30.4%26.3–34.5
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.7%12.5–16.9
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.0–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.5–13.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.6–12.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.5–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
Loneliness among adults30.1%25.8–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–649.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription87.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate87.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households50.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+20.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age42.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$79,327$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$159,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$849$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 1.3178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.31 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured