Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50268

in What Cheer, IowaPopulation 908

44.23/ 100

Ranked #23,194 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #893 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 3.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.6 pCi/L

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.1%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.11%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

42.4%

in the top 11.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

18.1%

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

What Cheer, Iowa (ZIP 50268), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 28% nationally (23,194th) and the bottom 3.2% of Iowa (893rd).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled radon registers in the top 4.3% nationally, energy burden lands in the top 2.7% nationally, and arsenic resides in the top 11.8% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lies in the top 11.2% nationally, and obesity settles in the top 11.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. More positively, modeled transportation noise rests in the bottom 8.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas registers in the bottom 16% nationally.

In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 50027, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.6–34.3
High blood pressure among adults40.1%35.9–44.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.4–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.3–10.9
Depression among adults21.6%18.4–24.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.0–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.4–41.8
Obesity among adults42.4%34.7–50.2
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.1%14.8–21.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%6.3–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.9–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%73.8–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.5–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.8%58.7–68.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.1%55.4–62.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%66.2–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%15.9–22.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.6%16.6–22.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.2%25.5–35.0
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%28.0–41.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.7%18.7–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.6–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.4–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.6–17.4
Any disability among adults32.9%28.5–37.2
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Independent living disability among adults9.2%8.0–10.3
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.0–18.5
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.4%21.3–28.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.1–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.3–15.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.7–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.8–8.8
Loneliness among adults32.9%28.8–38.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–6410.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle7.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription83.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate76.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households59.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+18.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$59,118$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$77,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$740$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured