Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50206

in New Providence, IowaPopulation 349

53.79/ 100

Ranked #10,970 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #350 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.6 pCi/L

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

5.9%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.4%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.5%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

73%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

17.1%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

12.7 mi

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.47%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Overall, New Providence, Iowa (ZIP 50206) places in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,970th) and the top 38% of Iowa (350th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled pfas sits in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and fiber broadband lies in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled transportation noise rests in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled radon is in the top 4.0% nationally, modeled binge drinking lands in the top 2.5% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Modeled arsenic registers in the top 8.3% nationally, walkability settles in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and distance to a community health center sits in the top 11.3% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 50239, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.8%25.0–30.7
High blood pressure among adults35.7%32.2–39.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.0–10.7
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.2–8.3
Depression among adults20.8%17.9–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.9–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%32.4–39.6
Obesity among adults38.5%31.9–45.2
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%9.2–13.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.5–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%76.2–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%74.7–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.9–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.0%64.7–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.8%63.7–70.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.6%73.7–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.4%18.4–24.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%12.6–17.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.5%20.3–28.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%25.3–35.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.2%14.7–19.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.1–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.6–15.2
Any disability among adults27.8%24.0–31.7
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.0–14.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.9–25.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.5–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.1–10.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.9–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.2–7.0
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.6–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.9–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–642.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)16.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription73.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate84.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households47.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+32.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age48.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$79,306$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$112,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$613$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 1.3678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.36 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured