Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50010

in Ames, IowaPopulation 33,799

59.95/ 100

Ranked #4,905 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #67 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 7.3%)

Ranked #7 of 19 Ames, IA ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

22.6%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

5.2%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.8%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.5%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.15 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.3%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.8%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.3%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.6%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 50010, one of several in Ames, Iowa ranks in the top 15% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,905th) and the top 7.3% of Iowa (67th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: transit rests in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled short sleep is in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled mobility disability settles in the bottom 4.2% nationally, mental-health providers lies in the top 6.5% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure resides in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Modeled diabetes lands in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and stroke registers in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Against that, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 1.4% nationally, and slow internet speeds rests in the top 2.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 50046, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Ames, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.3 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $65,398 predicts 78.4 years — 2.9 years above.

    Ranked #488 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 19.8; chronic-disease standing 94.2 (top 10%) — 74 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,775 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.4%17.2–21.6
High blood pressure among adults27.3%24.2–30.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.4–7.7
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Depression among adults21.3%18.3–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.2%28.8–35.4
Obesity among adults31.4%26.1–36.6
Stroke among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.7%5.4–8.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.6–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.6%67.0–71.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.6%71.9–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults78.8%76.5–80.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.2%68.9–77.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.7%65.5–71.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.5%73.8–85.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults22.6%19.1–25.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%9.3–12.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.3%17.3–23.4
Short sleep duration among adults27.8%23.0–32.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.8%12.9–16.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.0–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.6–16.1
Any disability among adults25.8%22.5–29.0
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.1
Mobility disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.7
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%18.0–24.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.8–14.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.8–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Loneliness among adults34.2%29.9–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–646.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)2.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)62.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription80.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate53.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population11.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households54.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+15.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age28.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$65,398$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$253,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$973$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured