Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50239

in St. Anthony, IowaPopulation 354

54.18/ 100

Ranked #10,469 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #319 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

3.6%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$151,250

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.2 pCi/L

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

19.1%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

7.6%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.4%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 10.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.0%

in the top 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite health measure, St. Anthony, Iowa (ZIP 50239) ranks in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,469th) and the top 35% of Iowa (319th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled pfas settles in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and household income resides in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband lies in the top 7.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled radon sits in the top 8.2% nationally, binge drinking is in the top 6.2% nationally, and arsenic settles in the top 6.9% nationally.

To spell things out, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Close by, ZIP 50278, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%26.5–32.8
High blood pressure among adults37.7%33.9–41.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.3–11.4
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.4–9.3
Depression among adults19.8%16.8–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.2–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%35.3–43.1
Obesity among adults42.8%36.5–49.3
Stroke among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.8%8.8–13.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.6–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.5–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.1–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.6–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.2%67.9–76.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.2%64.1–70.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.6%72.2–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.0%16.8–23.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%11.8–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%20.9–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%27.5–36.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%15.5–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.1–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.6–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.1–15.1
Any disability among adults29.6%25.2–33.8
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.7–10.0
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.1–8.5
Mobility disability among adults14.0%11.7–16.3
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%18.4–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.3–13.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.7–10.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.7–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.2–7.2
Loneliness among adults29.7%25.7–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–642.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription87.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate93.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households84.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+4.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age33.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$151,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$354,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured