Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50134

in Kelley, IowaPopulation 770

62.06/ 100

Ranked #3,489 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.9%)

Ranked #37 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 4.1%)

Ranked #6 of 19 Ames, IA ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

23.3%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.3%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST51st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

24.9%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.4%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.0%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.0%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.8%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.4%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Kelley, Iowa (ZIP 50134) sits in the top 10.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,489th) and the top 4.1% of Iowa (37th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled short sleep rests in the bottom 1.9% nationally, pfas settles in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and food insecurity lands in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity rests in the bottom 7.4% nationally, home broadband subscription settles in the top 8.0% nationally, and modeled transportation lands in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Modeled colon screening rests in the top 6.2% nationally. Against that, modeled binge drinking settles in the top 1.1% nationally, and radon lands in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled arsenic rests in the top 4.5% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 50124, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Ames, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.6%21.2–26.2
High blood pressure among adults30.9%27.8–34.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.4
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.4–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.4–6.0
Depression among adults20.2%17.4–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%32.0–38.9
Obesity among adults33.5%28.4–38.6
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.2%5.1–7.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%4.3–6.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.0%72.0–77.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.3%74.0–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.8–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.4%69.3–77.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.2%70.3–75.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%72.7–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults23.3%20.0–26.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%9.8–14.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.2%16.2–22.3
Short sleep duration among adults27.3%23.0–31.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.7%11.8–15.7
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%12.9–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults10.5%9.3–11.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.4%9.9–13.0
Any disability among adults23.2%20.2–26.4
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Independent living disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Mobility disability among adults9.5%8.3–11.0
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.2–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%17.3–22.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.6–9.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.0%4.9–7.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.8–8.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.4–5.9
Loneliness among adults30.8%27.2–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–646.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)0.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription97.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate69.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households55.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+20.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age47.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$111,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$300,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$956$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured