Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08108

in Collingswood, New JerseyPopulation 18,654

65.82/ 100

Ranked #1,688 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.3%)

Ranked #233 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #68 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

25.4%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

160 intersections/sq mi

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.5%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

11.9%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.9%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.9%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.4%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

10.3%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Collingswood, New Jersey (ZIP 08108) stands in the top 5.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,688th) and the top 40% of New Jersey (233rd).

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: modeled obesity sits in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and fatal road crashes resides in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Walkability stands in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled mobility disability sits in the bottom 4.2% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the bottom 3.2% nationally, transportation stands in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Modeled diabetes resides in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and independent living disability stands in the bottom 4.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled transportation noise sits in the top 8.1% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 08033, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.8 ± 1.2 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.5 years — 3.4 years above them.

    Ranked #616 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 26.9; chronic-disease standing 92.9 (top 10%) — 66 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,020 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.4%20.1–24.9
High blood pressure among adults28.5%25.6–31.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.9–9.4
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.2–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.3%3.7–4.8
Depression among adults18.7%16.3–21.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.9%6.9–9.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%33.5–40.0
Obesity among adults25.4%21.6–29.7
Stroke among adults2.4%2.2–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.7%5.4–8.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%5.3–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.1%72.0–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%74.3–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.8–91.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%66.1–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.4%68.7–74.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%72.1–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%16.7–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.3%8.0–11.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.9%15.4–20.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%31.0–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.9%10.5–13.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.9–16.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
Any disability among adults21.8%19.2–24.7
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Independent living disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.0
Mobility disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.8
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.1–2.6
Vision disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.9%16.5–21.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.6–9.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.8–5.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.5–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.6–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–643.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)58.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle9.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription94.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate63.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population5.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households48.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+19.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age40.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$108,151$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$395,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,756$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured