Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49821

in Daggett, MichiganPopulation 1,286

46.64/ 100

Ranked #20,600 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #712 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to an emergency room

19.1 mi

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

17 mi

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Park land

19.5%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

38.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.8 per million

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

19.9 mi

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

57.5 mi

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.1%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.4%

in the bottom 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Daggett, Michigan (ZIP 49821) sits in the bottom 36% nationally (20,600th) and the bottom 27% of Michigan (712th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 6.6% nationally, park land is in the top 7.1% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 9.4% nationally, dental providers registers in the top 10.2% nationally, and modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 11.7% nationally. On the other hand, distance to an emergency room resides in the top 6.1% nationally, and fatal road crashes lies in the top 7.4% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles in the top 8.3% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 9.0% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. ZIP 49812, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 93.7 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 12.9 — 81 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #461 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.9%33.8–42.0
High blood pressure among adults44.1%39.4–48.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.1%11.0–13.3
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.4%9.9–13.0
Depression among adults27.3%23.4–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.0–17.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.8%36.0–45.6
Obesity among adults39.8%31.3–48.5
Stroke among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%10.6–15.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.2–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.3–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.3%79.0–85.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.4%87.8–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.7%66.7–76.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.5%63.8–70.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%67.8–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.1–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%14.7–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%23.6–33.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%28.3–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%19.3–25.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%14.8–19.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%12.9–16.8
Any disability among adults37.1%32.4–42.1
Hearing disability among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.8
Mobility disability among adults18.5%16.1–21.3
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.0–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.5–16.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.1–16.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.1–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.4
Loneliness among adults31.0%25.9–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)5.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription85.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate92.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households63.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+26.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age45.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$58,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$164,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$788$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.1 yr ± 1.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 83.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured