Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48897

in Woodland, MichiganPopulation 1,669

46.65/ 100

Ranked #20,576 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #711 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #65 of 79 Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

21.4%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

77.8%

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Woodland, Michigan (ZIP 48897) ranks in the bottom 36% nationally (20,576th) and the bottom 27% of Michigan (711th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 11.7% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled arsenic registers in the top 5.8% nationally, walkability sits in the bottom 10.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians stands at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband settles in the bottom 21% nationally.

In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 48849, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%29.8–36.6
High blood pressure among adults37.9%33.9–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.2–11.2
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.5–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.8–11.5
Depression among adults27.2%23.7–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.1–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%34.9–43.1
Obesity among adults39.0%32.2–46.1
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%14.6–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.8–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.8–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.0–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%84.8–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%63.0–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.7%59.0–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.7%65.0–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.1–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%15.1–20.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%23.3–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%29.8–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.7–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.6–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.1–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.1%14.3–18.3
Any disability among adults35.7%31.3–40.2
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.0–18.6
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.4–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.3–17.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.5–16.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.3–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.9–9.2
Loneliness among adults31.7%26.9–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.8–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6411.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription77.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate86.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households52.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+21.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age42.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$69,531$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$224,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$812$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 1.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.07 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured