Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54143

in Marinette, WisconsinPopulation 15,119

53.82/ 100

Ranked #10,937 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #382 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

12.1 days/year

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

56.9%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

152 units

in the top 14.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.5%

in the bottom 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

0 days/year

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US20th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Radon

1.1 pCi/L

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US27th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Marinette, Wisconsin (ZIP 54143), overall, ranks in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,937th) and the bottom 50% of Wisconsin (382nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: physicians stands in the top 5.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center resides at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled expected annual loss is in the top 1.6% nationally, and disaster risk sits in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 2.6% nationally, pfas lies in the top 9.4% nationally, and binge drinking stands in the top 12.7% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 54159, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.3%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%26.4–32.9
High blood pressure among adults35.3%31.5–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Depression among adults23.9%20.5–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.9–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%32.7–40.7
Obesity among adults37.6%30.9–44.4
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.1%6.5–9.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.5–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.6–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.6–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.6–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%65.1–74.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.9%62.4–69.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%70.4–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%15.6–22.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.6–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%24.7–33.4
Short sleep duration among adults31.6%25.8–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.0%16.6–21.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.1–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.6–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%12.2–15.4
Any disability among adults32.8%28.7–36.9
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.7
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.3–17.3
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%17.1–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.4–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.5–15.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.1–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%6.0–7.8
Loneliness among adults29.2%24.9–34.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–644.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)5.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription91.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate78.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households57.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+21.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$64,491$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$142,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$814$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 1.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.11 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured