Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49744

in Herron, MichiganPopulation 934

46.34/ 100

Ranked #20,940 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #729 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

36.7 mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 10.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

11.6%

in the bottom 11.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.4%

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Herron, Michigan (ZIP 49744), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 35% nationally (20,940th) and the bottom 25% of Michigan (729th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 3.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden registers in the bottom 11.7% nationally, and modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 12.0% nationally. Modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. By contrast, walkability resides in the bottom 10.7% nationally, and unemployment rests in the top 14.9% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the top 15% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 49707, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%29.0–36.7
High blood pressure among adults38.2%33.7–42.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.8–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%8.8–12.0
Depression among adults29.1%24.9–33.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%10.8–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%32.4–41.4
Obesity among adults41.5%32.9–50.1
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.0–12.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.4–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%73.9–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%75.8–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.1–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%57.8–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.6%58.8–66.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%66.0–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%13.8–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.8%15.5–22.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%22.4–32.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%28.1–42.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.4–25.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.2–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.1–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.5–19.3
Any disability among adults35.4%30.4–40.6
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.6
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.6–11.6
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.0–19.2
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%19.3–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.8%12.9–19.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.6%12.8–18.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.6–13.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–10.0
Loneliness among adults32.6%27.3–38.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.4–10.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–647.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)9.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)8.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate89.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households51.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age36.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$77,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$194,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 1.0578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.05 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured