Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49337

in Newaygo, MichiganPopulation 13,149

47.87/ 100

Ranked #19,086 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #638 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

13.0%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US84th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

57.1%

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Newaygo, Michigan (ZIP 49337) sits in the bottom 40% nationally (19,086th) and the bottom 34% of Michigan (638th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: park land rests in the top 9.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers registers in the top 13.7% nationally, and modeled tree cover lands in the top 17% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 20% nationally, and pharmacy settles in the top 20% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the bottom 25% nationally. On the other hand, modeled pfas is in the top 13.4% nationally, and disaster risk rests in the top 16% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 49327, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 86.7; chronic-disease standing 28.3 — 58 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,858 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.9%30.5–37.5
High blood pressure among adults39.9%35.7–44.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.2
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.5–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%9.2–11.6
Depression among adults27.1%23.5–31.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.4–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%34.0–42.6
Obesity among adults37.6%30.5–45.4
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%11.4–16.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%6.5–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.2–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%76.8–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.4–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.5%63.7–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.6–67.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%64.8–79.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.7–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.6–20.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%23.1–32.0
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%27.2–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%19.2–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.3–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.2–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%14.2–17.9
Any disability among adults35.2%30.9–39.6
Hearing disability among adults9.0%8.1–10.0
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Mobility disability among adults16.6%14.6–18.8
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.2–25.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.4–18.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.2–17.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.7–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Loneliness among adults31.2%26.5–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.3–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–646.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)10.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription87.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate86.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households59.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+20.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age43.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$67,526$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$202,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,049$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured