Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49306

in Belmont, MichiganPopulation 11,028

62.17/ 100

Ranked #3,420 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.7%)

Ranked #79 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 8.2%)

Ranked #9 of 79 Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI ZIPs (top 11.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

77.9%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.3%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.1%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.1%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

11.1%

in the bottom 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.9%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Belmont, Michigan (ZIP 49306) sits in the top 10.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,420th) and the top 8.2% of Michigan (79th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: homeownership sits in the top 7.5% nationally, modeled colon screening stands in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Modeled transportation sits in the bottom 8.7% nationally, housing insecurity stands in the bottom 8.8% nationally, and tooth loss resides in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 11.5% nationally, and fair or poor health stands in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability resides in the bottom 10.8% nationally. Against that, modeled pfas sits in the top 2.3% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 49301, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.4 ± 1.8 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.9 years — 2.5 years above them.

    Ranked #1,153 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.7%25.9–31.5
High blood pressure among adults33.9%30.8–37.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.8–11.7
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Depression among adults27.0%23.9–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.7–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.9%30.5–37.2
Obesity among adults32.5%28.1–37.2
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.1%4.9–7.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.7%3.7–5.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%74.8–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.4–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%89.0–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.0%70.3–77.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.6%73.0–77.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%71.5–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.4–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.1%9.4–13.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.3%15.5–21.3
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%26.6–34.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.1%12.2–16.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.2–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.6–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
Any disability among adults25.2%22.1–28.4
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Mobility disability among adults10.7%9.2–12.3
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.1–23.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.9–9.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.7–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.0–8.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.4–5.9
Loneliness among adults28.9%25.2–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription96.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate96.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households55.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+23.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age44.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$115,039$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$373,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured