Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49688

in Tustin, MichiganPopulation 2,508

46.71/ 100

Ranked #20,501 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #704 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

27.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US85th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

3.7%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Tustin, Michigan (ZIP 49688), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 36% nationally (20,501st) and the bottom 28% of Michigan (704th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: childcare lands in the top 1.7% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 12.3% nationally. Outpatient rests in the top 13.1% nationally, and park land lies in the top 18% nationally. Set against that, fatal road crashes sits in the top 15% nationally, and modeled energy burden settles in the top 13.3% nationally. Physicians registers at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Crowded housing stands in the top 21% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 22% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 49601, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.2%30.8–37.7
High blood pressure among adults39.6%35.6–43.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.7–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.6%9.1–12.2
Depression among adults28.1%24.3–32.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.6–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%33.8–42.2
Obesity among adults38.8%31.6–46.9
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.0%10.7–15.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.6–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.2–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.4–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%84.8–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.5%63.6–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.6%57.9–65.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%66.8–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.2–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%15.0–20.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.1%23.5–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%28.2–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.2%19.0–25.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%16.7–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.6–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.3–18.7
Any disability among adults36.5%31.9–41.3
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.5
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.8–11.4
Mobility disability among adults17.0%14.6–19.4
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.3–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%12.7–18.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.5–18.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.2–12.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.5
Loneliness among adults32.7%27.7–38.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.1–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–646.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)8.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate83.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households58.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+22.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age39.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$63,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$188,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,091$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 1.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.03 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured