Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49283

in Spring Arbor, MichiganPopulation 5,039

58.14/ 100

Ranked #6,289 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #164 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #1 of 18 Jackson, MI ZIPs (top 5.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

3.3%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.9%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.23 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.1%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

55.7%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.9%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.4%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Spring Arbor, Michigan (ZIP 49283) ranks in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,289th) and the top 17% of Michigan (164th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: floodplain exposure is at the national minimum, and modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Elder services resides in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled colon screening registers in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled diabetes rests in the bottom 4.6% nationally, high blood pressure stands in the bottom 8.0% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Set against that, slow internet speeds sits in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled pfas is in the top 10.0% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Close by, ZIP 48854, about 16 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jackson, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.5%22.2–26.9
High blood pressure among adults28.9%25.9–32.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.1
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.9–6.6
Depression among adults27.2%23.7–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.1%7.0–9.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.9%26.9–33.2
Obesity among adults30.8%25.9–36.3
Stroke among adults2.6%2.3–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.0%5.6–8.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.1–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.9%70.3–75.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.9%71.9–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%79.0–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.0%70.2–77.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%67.5–73.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%72.2–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%15.9–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.5%7.8–11.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.4%16.8–24.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%31.9–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.0%12.7–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%15.7–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.3%9.7–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%11.6–17.3
Any disability among adults30.1%25.6–35.0
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.0–8.6
Mobility disability among adults10.7%9.1–12.4
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.0–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.9%18.1–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.2–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.6–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.1–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.1–7.8
Loneliness among adults34.6%29.8–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.2–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–641.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription94.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate76.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population3.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+11.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age32.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$108,464$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$218,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,244$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured